An individual’s capability to perform better in a number of fields such as sport, fashion design, music, studies and achievements in social function can be the main reason to categories the person as being perfect and better than the rest.The justification of whether a person is better than the other cannot be concluded by use of a single aspect (Chapman 78).The important factor to them is the scoring and the good coordination with the other team members, this is what makes them famous and earn a living and not spending their entire life straining to acquire more knowledge from the books which is not applicable in the real life.
I agree with Penrod that the success of celebrities is partly responsible for anti intellectual since most of the popular celebrities especially those that practice different sport and music have very little education that they might have acquired from school.
However, these celebrities are far much better in their lifestyle as compared to scholar who have gone to school and are still involving their entire life with reading more books.
They have achieved a lot from the talent they have and even gone to extends of helping the less fortunate in the society by opening of children homes (Chapman 27).
According to most of the famous celebrities in both sports and music, reading of a lot of materials and philosophical books is straining, time wastage and unnecessary.
“Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids” Penrod suggests that scholar are disliked in part because of the “opinion that alarm for grades and test scores excludes the coexistence of normal social activities – and that this becomes a “self-fulfilling prophecy; ‘nerds’ are excluded from social activity because of their label, and that label in turn intensifies through the resulting lack of social contact.” Do you agree? I conquer with Penrod when he suggests that most scholars are disliked in the society because of referring to themselves as smart kids.
This is because scholars only view their smartness from a centralized point of view, acquiring knowledge from books.Grant Penrod’s essay “Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids” takes the reader on a psychological journey towards understanding society’s deep-seated distaste of smart kids or “nerds.” According to Penrod, this dislike comes from society’s celebration and appreciation for celebrities and figure heads who lack a college or a high school diploma.Famous faces such as Christina Aguilera, Kid Rock, L. Cool J., Sammy Sosa, and even President Bush have become very publically successful despite their arguable lack of intelligence.Question 2 Do you agree with Penrod that the success of these celebrities is partly responsible for anti- intellectualism? What evidence could be offered as a counterargument?It is true that most of the celebrities achieve a lot and become more successful and prominent people in life, without the essence of education.This is majorly because they are able to live comfortable life and earn a living from their talents. This according to the celebrities does not require any straining reading from the books but hard work, persistence and focus.For example, for an individual to be able to play a certain type of sport, such as basketball, very little education is needed.Several aspects about the person should be recorded in a list and then followed by a strategic analysis which will show if the individual performs better in each of the aspects.The analysis should be in a logical and systematic manner after which the results can be compared to other members of the society.Youths can still violet to the mistreatment they undergo without the influence of the media (Paul & Marzilli 47). What reasons does she give to support her claim, and does she convince you?For instance, youths found in remote areas where there is no direct assess to the media still violet and riot for their rights and force their parents or the society to implement their desire. If not, do you at least a ccept her argument as plausible?