Some court-watchers have argued against giving weight to nominees’ undergraduate writings — David Lat, editor-at-large of legal news site Above the Law, wrote earlier this year in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that, “Collegiate scribblings from decades ago should have no bearing on one’s fitness for public office, and making an issue of them is bad for the country.”Asked about that, Aron said that Rao had decades to disavow what she wrote in college and had not.Aron pointed to a speech Rao gave in June that, according to notes that she included in her nomination materials, indicated that Rao spoke about how she “enjoyed participating in the debates of that time with my classmates.”Rao’s writings since college continued to underscore her conservative leanings, but they changed in substance and tone — she’s written multiple scholarly papers on the subject of human dignity as it relates to constitutional rights, and her op-eds don’t use the kind of rhetoric she embraced in her early twenties.In the article, author Sarah Trillin wrote that she interviewed five of the six women who were members, and the article quoted, under fake names, five different women.
Some court-watchers have argued against giving weight to nominees’ undergraduate writings — David Lat, editor-at-large of legal news site Above the Law, wrote earlier this year in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that, “Collegiate scribblings from decades ago should have no bearing on one’s fitness for public office, and making an issue of them is bad for the country.”Asked about that, Aron said that Rao had decades to disavow what she wrote in college and had not.Tags: Advertising Essays Gay MarriageHelp Developing A Thesis StatementPolitical Science Essay Writing ServiceEssay Fiction Orwell Reader ReportageDissertation Writing TechniquesPh D Thesis AbstractExample Of A Problem Solving SituationSchool Violence Research PaperMolecular Biology Research PapersForgiveness Essay
In pieces reviewed by Buzz Feed News that Rao wrote between 19 — she graduated from Yale University in 1995 — she described race as a “hot, money-making issue,” affirmative action as the “anointed dragon of liberal excess,” welfare as being for “for the indigent and lazy,” and LGBT issues as part of “trendy” political movements.The redeeming insights are just so few and far between, stranded between deserts of lame, forced conference humor and straightforward, even banal points dressed up in comically unnecessary jargon. But, for the first time, I start to wonder if it’s not just me. Instead, I hope to isolate the sick blisters on the academic body politic that are rotting away our ability to even talk about such things in mildly interesting, let alone useful, ways.In my head, all I can hear is Hornby by way of John Cusack . To be an academic in today’s America is to be plunged into a perennial identity crisis.Rao has never been a judge, and absent any record on the bench, her writings as a student and later as a prominent law professor, which she submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, are expected to feature prominently in the fight over her nomination.Nan Aron, president of the liberal advocacy group Alliance for Justice, which first highlighted Rao’s college writings to Buzz Feed News, said Rao’s columns were “consistent with the administration’s support of candidates who make racially insensitive statements and comments hostile to sexual assault survivors.”“She shouldn't be awarded a seat on what many view as the second highest court in the country, which is often a stepping stone to the Supreme Court,” Aron said. The views she expressed a quarter century ago as a college student writing for her student newspaper were intentionally provocative, designed to raise questions and push back against liberal elitism that dominated her campus at the time,” Kupec said. C Circuit.”As an undergraduate student at Yale, Rao published a number of pieces in two campus publications, the Yale Free Press and Yale Herald, as well as in the Washington Times as a journalism fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. In a July 1994 piece for the Washington Times denouncing “multiculturalists” on campus Rao wrote that, “Underneath their touchy-feely talk of tolerance, they seek to undermine American culture.”“They argue that culture, society and politics have been defined — and presumably defiled — by white, male heterosexuals hostile to their way of life.Liberal advocacy groups denounced Rao’s nomination the moment Trump announced it in November, pointing to her conservative record.Politico reported last week that Rao had been added to the administration’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees.On date rape, Rao wrote that if a woman “drinks to the point where she can no longer choose, well, getting to that point was part of her choice.”Rao is nominated for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s former seat on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.It's an influential court sometimes referred to as the second most important court both because of the cases it hears — it’s the main forum for big fights over government and executive power — and the fact that a number of alumni have landed on the US Supreme Court.Her nomination to the DC Circuit, which is the main court for disputes over agency power, was backed by former White House counsel Don Mc Gahn, who saw the appointment of conservative judges as part of a broader effort to scale back the power of the administrative state.Rao has led the Trump administration’s deregulation push; the Senate confirmed her as head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in July 2017.