For centuries, the idea of God has been a part of man’s history.
Past and present, there has always been a different integration consisting of the believers and the non-believers of God.
Once again, he can begin to wonder whether it was an evil demon who caused him to believe in the certainty of these truths.
Suddenly, things do not look too rosy for his system of certain knowledge; if he needs to keep every truth perpetually before his mind, then he cannot expect too make much headway in unraveling the facts of nature.
He discovers that he has quite a few of them, prominent among these being the truths of mathematics and logic, and he is optimistic about his chances for developing a system of certain knowledge. These clear and distinct perceptions are only indubitable so long as he is attending to them.
As soon as they fall out of awareness, the doubt can creep back in.An analysis essay assumes that you break a larger subject into subcategories and then examine each of them to form an opinion about the whole.After you have taken a problem apart, you must describe its components, explain how they are interrelated, and ...Gaunilo was one of the first philosophers to criticize Anselm? Anselm then dismissed any criticisms that did not relate to a necessary existence. is a statement that is interpreted different by many different philosophers and many different people.Gaunilo went on to further criticize Anselms argument by putting forward the concept that the notion of God cannot be conceived, he goes onto explain that atheists would not accept that God can be fully understood or grasped and therefore humans cannot fully conceive God. Conclusion Overall the Ontological Argument for the existence of God is both supported and criticised by many philosophers. Many people believe this shows that God is a supremely perfect being and must exist whilst others will fail to understand how God can be conceived by humans because they cannot comprehend a being like God and how this would evidently lead to his existence. t possible to prove the existence of God from the concept of God alone because I fail to see how something so advanced can be conceived by humans without any experience of God.The ontological argument provides different theories for the existence of God each with their strengths and weaknesses however to conclude I do not believe that the Ontological argument would convince an Atheist to believe in the existence of God because ?? may be true for some believes it is not necessarily true for others.Only if true premises lead to valid conclusions can a ?? argument be said to have fully succeeded, this cannot be said of the Ontological argument as it has flaws and many argue its premises do not lead to its conclusions. s second predicate fails to meet the conclusion that God exists.Anselm, an Archbishop, was the first to propose the Ontological argument which was included in the second and third chapters of his book ‘proslogion’, a book written as a prayer and/or meditation to reflect on the attributes of God and not originally to prove the existence of a God. Middle A statement is analytically true if the clauses or predicates within the statement say something necessarily true of all instances of the subject and Descartes maintained existence belonged analytically to God as three angles were analytically predicated of a triangle. s argument can be applied to other non-accepted arguments.The Ontological argument also faces many criticisms by different philosophers for not proving the existence of God. Anselm responded to this by explaining that only arguments of necessary existence can be applied to the ?? theory and the island theory is a contingent object and therefore can always be improved therefore never reaching a state of perfection.Reasoning from this principle he arrives at two other causal principles: (1) There must be as much reality in a cause as in an effect, and so, (2) there must be as much formal reality in a cause of an idea as there is objective reality in an idea.Since we have an idea with infinite objective reality (namely, the idea of God), Descartes is able to conclude that there is a being with infinite formal reality who caused this idea.